Out of touch   15/3/2006

We in the regional and local media are accustomed to patronisation being patronised by
the big city press. We comfort ourselves with the knowledge we work harder than them, we can’t afford the type of blunders they make — like spelling country towns wrong — and that we can’t bullshit our readers like they do.
We also like to think we’ve got better manners as we watch them plunder our resources without gratitude whenever a major story happens to break in our neck of the woods.
A major US poll has found that our values resonate with readers. And although the pay cheques don’t match, if pleasing your clients is the measuring stick, we’re head and shoulders above the slickers.
Americans continue to be troubled about the state of the press. But journalists themselves are troubled as well, according to “The State of the News Media 2006,” a massive series of surveys and analyses released yesterday by the Project for Excellence in Journalism, a research group affiliated with Columbia University.
Local TV news and local newspapers won the most accolades from the public. Both were rated favorably by three-quarters of the respondents with majorities agreeing that local news organizations concentrated on facts rather than opinions. Such major dailies as the New York Times did not fare so well, garnering a 38 percent favorability rating.

Regional and local journalists, unlike many city counterparts, are no more likely to stand out in their community than bank officers, cops or shopkeepers. That is why the researchers’ “values gap on social issues” between journalists and the mainstream is not as wide outside the capitals. It helps that regional towns and suburbs are usually devoid of “hip” enclaves where lefty, opinionated journalism flourishes. These figures demonstrate the great divide:

In a survey of 547 journalists, 6 percent felt that belief in God is necessary to be moral; the figure was 58 percent among the general public. About 88 percent of the press, compared with 51 percent of the public, think society should accept homosexuality.
An ideological divide between the national press and the public also persists. The survey found that 20 percent of the public described themselves as liberal; the figure was 34 percent among journalists. Although 33 percent of the public deemed themselves conservative; 7 percent of the press members identified themselves as conservative. The majority of journalists — 54 percent — say they are moderates, compared with 41 percent of the public.

Filed Under: -

6 Comments for 'Out of touch'

  1.  
    Mild Colonial Boy
    15/3/2006 | 1:19 pm
     

    Is “patronisation” a real word?

  2.  
    15/3/2006 | 2:28 pm
     

    Considering that the Columbia School of Journalism is very left-wing, the reality is probably even worse for the MSM.

  3.  
    15/3/2006 | 5:43 pm
     

    It helps that regional towns and suburbs are usually devoid of “hip’’ enclaves where lefty, opinionated journalism flourishes.

    I remember reading of a comment by a British Labour MP many years ago. He said, “Life’s easy for me because I’ve got no college on me patch.”

    That is, his electorate did not contain a tertiary education institution. They poison everything they touch.

  4.  
    Bruce
    16/3/2006 | 6:11 am
     

    Well yeah, Slatts. We’re in a regional area and the local rag’s office is across the road, from which the editor (and only journo?) pops in to our shop for a snack and a chat. It’s a trendy enclave with a very vocal PC set but he knows he relies on the local businesses for his bread and butter and manages a difficult balancing act. Openminded and willing to listen. Good on you all, regional journos.

  5.  
    16/3/2006 | 9:42 am
     

    The question is, whatever happened to the ‘Boort and Quambatook Standard Times’? It was going ten years ago, run by one editor-journalist using a printing press that should have been in a museum.

    Perhaps they opened a university at Quambatook, which wouldn’t surprise me these days.

  6.  
    Garrick Meadows
    21/7/2009 | 7:40 pm
     

    I was the owner/editor of the BSandQT until 1995, when the masthead was sold to Kerang’s “Northern Times” and my wife and I moved to Shepparton to grow squab (pigeon) for the gourmet market. It just got too much for the two of us to keep up with the production, printing and everything else.

    To correct one statement, however, far from using a printing press that belonged in a museum, we had the latest model Heidelberg GTO press (the first in country Victoria)and fully computerised typesetting, while retaining the traditional “hot metal” for some commercial printing.

Leave a comment

(required)

(required)


Information for comment users
Line and paragraph breaks are implemented automatically. Your e-mail address is never displayed.

First time commenters may have their comment moderated. Please do not re submit your comment if it does not appear immediately.


RSS feed for comments on this post |